committed vs actual investments 3b - feature
SHARE
Focus Paper

Dissecting the ETP Annual Report (Part 3): It was only RM12.9 billion of ACTUAL investment

Going in the right direction isn’t the same as having reached your destination.  Commitment isn’t the same as achievement.

PEMANDU trumpeted the RM179 billion investments brought in by the ETP in 2011, but these are merely committed investments. Actual investments were a mere  RM12.9 billion, equivalent to just 7% of the RM179 billion committed.

Commitment is also only commendable if it is believable. Unfortunately, the wobbly financial footing of the project owners of some big projects  doesn’t inspire much faith in their ability to carry the big ticket items through. For example, the project developer of the RM9.6 billion Karambunai Integrated Resort is being sued for defaulting on a piddling RM18 million of rental payments.

There is perhaps not much harm in making overstated achievements a cause for celebration, but the same cannot be said when they are made into a compass. While proclaiming that the RM94 billion private investments in Malaysia last year exceeded its target by 113%, PEMANDU said, “This development validated our push to make the private sector the engine of economic growth.” The gloomy truth is that the ETP itself brought in only RM12.9 billion, which includes both private and government investments.

So, what exactly is ‘validating’ PEMANDU’s confidence that its push on the private sector is working? Get the full story in our latest Dissecting the ETP Annual Report Part 3: It was only RM12.9 billion of ACTUAL investment.

This entry was posted in Focus Paper. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
 
 

Funding

REFSA is funded by individuals and organisations who share our vision for a better Malaysia and support our commitment to impartial research. If you or your corporation would like to contribute to REFSA’s initiatives or fund a specific research project, please support us.